Home

Advertisement

Customize
Aurora
08 December 2009 @ 10:41 pm
It's going to pour this week. There is something very comforting about that. I've been waiting for the cold for a while, and now it is coming, and now I am really here at this time, in the non-summer portion of the year. I am in America and I love it, I truly do. I have friends here who I will miss, who I will write to, who I will visit. I am making friends and I am feeling loved, and even when I'm not, who cares? I am here. I love the rain outside when I'm warm inside. I sat and drank far too much coffee with a friend I'm intrigued by, and stared at the rain on the window, on the pavement. I listened and talked and we protested in the rain. And that is what I need from friends, I need the protests in the rain at 9am and I need the coffee afterwards. I think we find ourselves everywhere. Under sofas, inside dark cupboards, in the arms of a friend, in the bottom of a cup, and in photographs that capture the moment that you didn't even notice at the time. I am obsessive. It's okay though, I don't mind it sometimes. I love my friends with all I can and then when I can't I'll hate them but still underneath that, love them more. Hate that can be scratched away with a nail like grime on a window. Love shining through underneath like sun through clear glass, and every cliche is true when it comes to love. I have missed writing. I have missed talking and speaking and expressing me through fingers on keys. Pen and paper is more difficult now than this, and that's technology I suppose, and that's the sad fact of time and progress and the diminishing use of old ways. Sometimes you have to just type type type and maybe amongst the drivel a real idea will come out to play. Lying quiet beneath dust and discarded objects like a treasure in an attic. One clear metaphor/similie/idea/non-bullshit expression. And you have to keep writing to find it, keep writing to let it go, let it pour out of you like the weather outside. Write write write until you find something to say. That's my plan anyway.
 
 
Aurora
09 September 2009 @ 12:40 pm
What makes a woman? In the case of Caster Semenya, apparently nothing makes a woman, when you are trying to prove that you are one. In the vast history of gender repression, of homophobic tension, and of scientific rule, never has biology been so quickly thrown out of the window. For three years now Caster Semenya has been undergoing sex testing, because while apparently it takes nothing to make a woman, it takes nothing but a winner to make a man. A woman who is too good to be a woman; a woman who is so good at what she does, that the IAAF claim that she must be a man, and not only do they state this in private to each other, written on notes and whispered behind hands, but they are bold enough to come forward and argue their case to the world.

So what made them make this bold statement? Well, other than her incredible sporting power, she has…muscles… and a deep voice. Some say she even looks… ‘mannish’. Try your hardest to hold back the shudders…this is a woman who doesn’t wear make-up. After some speculation, science was eventually called in on the case, and so began the long trial of sex testing. First comes the visual physical test, which (imagine it now) most people would find mortifying, though it comes a close second to the embarrassment of having your gender so openly questioned and denied. She passed step one, she looked like a woman under her clothes, but as we all know, there are ways to get around being the sex you were born and so the next step was testosterone levels. Hers were high, higher than many, but not high enough to conclusively state that she is male. The next step? Oh, gather ‘evidence’ from her hometown, evidence of a tomboyish sense of fashion and a lack of boyfriends. Because if there is one thing we all know, it’s that a lack of men in your life, makes you a man. The issue here is not whether Caster Semenya is a man; the issue is the type of evidence being used to deny her womanhood. Not only do I find this offensive on behalf of women and men, but also on behalf of South Africa, whose females are being judged by a European idea of femininity. The idea that a different culture could cherish different traits in a gender seems to be lost on the IAAF.

This brings me to my original question; what makes a woman? At what point would her testosterone levels bypass female and become male? We are taught sex and gender as if it is all so concrete, so secure and final. At what point do the two genders merge, what is the exact count that would tip the scale and turn a person from one stereotype to the next? And if she did begin life as a man, and she had undergone a sex-change operation, what would that mean for her status now? If the IAAF discovers she was once male, does that mean she cheated? Then of course there is the question of intersex people, and which race should they participate in? To me, this whole fiasco outlines how ridiculous all these gender stereotypes are, the ideas that men and women are born so completely different, with their opposite interests and their gendered character traits. What makes a woman? Attraction to men? A penchant for skirts? A low level of testosterone? A certain body shape? Simone De Beauvoir famously stated ‘One is not born a woman, but rather, becomes one.’ So what do you want to become? Who do you want to become? A man? A woman? A stereotype that can only allow themselves certain talents and shortcomings? Personally, I’d rather just be me. I’d rather just live by what I believe is right and act upon my emotions and not worry about whether I’m meant to be good at something because of my sex, or whether it is strange that I have a knack for something ‘manly’. The huge barrier between what makes a man and what makes a woman is a combined product of society and our unwillingness to accept difference, and if the case of Caster Semenya has taught us anything, it should be that.
 
 
Aurora
23 May 2009 @ 09:55 pm
I do not consider myself ‘straight’. Nor do I consider myself ‘gay’. I am uncomfortable with ‘bisexual’. Saying ‘I am…’ any of these things gives me a muscle-tensing feeling, that one I get when I know I’m saying something that isn’t quite true.

I have far too much of an invested interest in girls to be straight. It’s not very often that I actually have what I would call a ‘crush’ on a girl; I don’t often imagine myself dating a girl, it’s not something that I feel I’m looking for. But I would never rule it out either. I’m attracted to girls in some ways. I think most people are, even if it’s only the tiniest little thought at the back of their mind, I think it’s hard not to be in this society that makes us stare at girl’s bodies all of the time, in this society that fetishizes girls. We compare ourselves and we want to be each other and maybe sometimes that admiration of shape goes a little further.

I daydream about guys and crush on almost every guy I fleetingly meet. When I think of the future, it is males I see. But they scare me, and I haven’t worked out why that is yet. I have far too many issues with myself and my body to be very comfortable around them when I first meet them. For this reason, I don’t have many male friends, nor many male acquaintances, though I’m trying to work on this.

I don’t believe in calling myself bisexual, because I honestly don’t believe that it sums me up. To me, bisexuality is about having at least an almost equal interest in both sexes, and I just don’t. I’m interested in girls in more of a sexual way than a soppy way in all reality. But I’m willing to believe that one day I may fall in love, or just in lust, with a girl. If that happens, I have no problem with it, and I don’t want to have to have some big deal change of sexuality if that happens. To me, sexuality is a free-flowing shape-shifting thing. I understand that to others it isn’t; I’m definitely not telling you that I think everyone is bisexual, though I did ponder on that at one point. To me, giving myself a name for the way I feel is like calling myself ‘happy’ or ‘sad’, it changes, it is always at risk of changing, so why build something so concrete? I can’t read the future, I can’t know for certain how I will feel tomorrow, let alone in ten years time.

I’m interested in so much more than anatomy. I like the little things; the way someone stumbles over an explanation, or forgets to catch themselves before they expose their passion for something silly. I think there is a lot of bad press for bisexuality; many view it as a source of desperation, or a sign of promiscuity; a passing phase, or a stop on the way to ‘coming out for real’.

I’ve always felt it was restrictive to the nature of love and lust to try to bind it, section it off, call one part ‘right’ and one part ‘wrong’. In my ideal world, sexuality wouldn’t have these names, or they wouldn’t be at all important. It’s never made sense to me that anyone would discriminate based on sexuality. Because really, what does it matter who your friend is sleeping with, as long as it’s consensual? What does it matter if your work colleague dresses up at the weekend? No human is born without emotion; that is what it means to be human after all. ‘Only human’, that’s how the phrase goes, because humans cannot control their emotion. And love is one of the strongest emotions. How could that be wrong?
 
 
Aurora
04 May 2009 @ 11:42 pm
71  

Do you ever feel like you’re on the crest of something? The tip of a wave just waiting to crash, but not down into sadness or despair, just crash on into a new part of your life; a new side of you. Sometimes I feel like that. We build our confidence out of bricks of opinion, friends and family and street strangers. They pass us concrete and we make a judgement on how to take it, whether to add a little filler and use it in our walls or just throw it away. Sometimes we take the bad concrete and we build it up around us instead of underneath us. The bad kind of walls that bury and hide and restrict us instead of giving us foundation and a platform from which to speak; not all concrete is good concrete. Sometimes, instead of a brick we are handed a sledgehammer. A sturdy opinion that we can use to break down the bad concrete, smash it and crumble it until we can see past those walls again, until we can see clearly the horizon and the sunset and most importantly the sunrise, the strengthening light of the future.


We’ve all given away bad concrete. Usually we take it from our own walls, desperate to give it away, to get rid of it, to move it out of our eye line, and so we try to pass it off as another’s property. Jealousy can do terrible things, and when someone’s platform is that much higher than yours, that much sturdier, that much more full with nothing but good opinion, the lust to knock them down a few stories can be overwhelming. Really though, you probably just can’t see the moat that surrounds them. The rushing currents that drag down those that try to reach them, the insecurity that flourishes behind deep rivers of water. Everybody struggles. Some just hide it better than others.

 
 
Aurora
21 March 2009 @ 10:49 am
comfort blanket is fraying and
soon i'll be flying alone.
all these threads to hold onto
might not be a good thing anyway,
how can you tell the difference between
holding on and being held back?
i've always imagined myself dragging behind,
being pulled by a lead,
it'd be nice to think i could lead the way,
it'd be nice to hold onto nothing but myself
and be free to fall, to freefall
as far as I can without damage.
Always need strings though; threads, leads,
need a parachute or a bungie rope


Or need to grow wings.
Found feathers on my pillow today.
I can't work out if I'm
shedding them or growing a new pair.
Searched my room for an hour to find
more, scattered around my coat.
A warm glow for a moment, a hard buzzing of happiness,
until I realised they weren't mine.
Pulled them from another
in an attempt to hold on.
Feathers between fingers and
the memory of a bird in flight,
path away from me. Skyward rising,
a streak of ebony in the sky,
and then gone.
 
 
 
 

Advertisement

Customize